Explaining teachers’ behavioural intentions towards differentiated instruction for inclusion: using the theory of planned behavior and the self-determination theory (Record no. 174925)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02071nam a2200181Ia 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20241023125315.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 241023s9999 xx 000 0 und d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency LDD
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kupers, Elisa
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Explaining teachers’ behavioural intentions towards differentiated instruction for inclusion: using the theory of planned behavior and the self-determination theory
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. United Kingdom
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Taylor & Francis
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2024
490 ## - Journal
Journal European Journal of Special Needs Education
Volume/sequential designation 39(4)
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note A cornerstone of inclusive education is teacher’s readiness to respond adequately to different educational needs of students in their diverse classroom. Differentiated instruction, referring to the process by which teachers carefully monitor students’ needs and progress, and adapt their instruction according to these differences, is a means to meet the needs of students of different levels. High-quality differentiated instruction is a complex process for teachers which needs careful preparation. This makes teachers’ intentions relating to differentiated instruction particularly relevant. In this article we compare two theoretical models to explain teachers’ intentions to differentiate: the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Self-determination theory (SDT). Secondary school teachers (n = 180) responded to a questionnaire in which we measured their intentions and predictor variables relating to both of the theoretical models. Linear regression showed that both the TPB as well as the SDT model significantly predicted teachers’ intentions (p < .01), but that the TPB model showed a better fit with the data (48 versus 32% explained variance). We conclude that in addition to the factors included in the TPB, autonomy might be a relevant factor in explaining teachers’intentions.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Differentiated instructioninclusionteachers
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Boer, Anke deBakker, AlianneJong, Frank de
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Link text click here to online access
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08856257.2023.2263717">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08856257.2023.2263717</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Article
Holdings
Date last seen Total checkouts Price effective from Koha item type Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Withdrawn status Home library Current library Date acquired
10/23/2024   10/23/2024 Article         Library and Documentation Division NCERT Library and Documentation Division NCERT 10/23/2024