ChatGPT and Academics: Its Suitability in Library and Information Science (Record no. 195099)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02566nam a22001937a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250408144349.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250408b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency LDD
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Thapa, Neelam
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title ChatGPT and Academics: Its Suitability in Library and Information Science
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. New Delhi :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Delhi Library Association ,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2024
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Other physical details p. 211-226
490 ## - Journal
Journal Library Herald
Volume/sequential designation Vol. 62(2)
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note This study evaluates ChatGPT, a recently developed AI tool created by OpenAI, with an emphasis on its value for academic work in the discipline of Library and Information Science (LIS). The study investigates how ChatGPT responds to LIS queries by administering two sets of questions, with a total of eight questions, on each of the three topics selected for the study. The outcomes demonstrate ChatGPT’s capacity to distinguish between various types of queries and deliver appropriate information. However, in terms of information accuracy and validity, it has been observed that there is a lack of specific information and the absence of suitable references. The major issue that was located is the fake and fabricated references provided by ChatGPT that need to be scrutinized thoroughly. The issue is especially considered to be important in the ambit of higher education since it creates major obstacles, particularly in the field of research. This is particularly in case of students, who impulsively follow the results without rationally examining it. It was also observed that ChatGPT gave a variety of responses to the same queries on various machines at distinct times. Authentic references are the basis of each research project. However, AI technologies, such as, ChatGPT do not provide realistic, verified references for specific topics, which might contribute to a lack of credibility and dependability in academic writing. The research analyzes the consequences of these findings and highlights the importance of addressing ethical issues around AI-powered academic tools. Also, libraries not only use AI based tools with caution while providing services using these tools, however, they also need to educate students about the strengths, limitations, and ethical considerations associated with these technologies.<br/><br/>
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element AI-Based Information Services
-- Artificial Intelligence
-- ChatGPT
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kushwaha, Rohit
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Link text click here to online access
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://libraryherald.dlaindia.in/post/chatgpt-and-academics-its-suitability-in-library-and-information-science">https://libraryherald.dlaindia.in/post/chatgpt-and-academics-its-suitability-in-library-and-information-science</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Article
Suppress in OPAC No
Holdings
Date last seen Total checkouts Price effective from Koha item type Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Withdrawn status Home library Current library Date acquired
04/08/2025   04/08/2025 Article   Dewey Decimal Classification       Library and Documentation Division NCERT Library and Documentation Division NCERT 04/08/2025